Food Tourism and Gastronomy Strategy & Action Plan

This is a template document. All text in [square brackets] must be completed by your organisation. It is a planning framework, not professional advice on food safety, employment or environmental regulation. Check local requirements with the relevant authority.

What this template covers

  1. Strategic context
  2. Defining food tourism locally
  3. Destination food identity
  4. Food tourism asset map
  5. Visitor perspective
  6. Stakeholders and the food ecosystem
  7. Current experience assessment
  8. Comparator analysis
  9. Strategic diagnosis
  10. Vision
  11. Strategic objectives
  12. Experience development
  13. Food storytelling
  14. Sustainability and responsibility
  15. Governance
  16. Action plan and workstreams
  17. Measurement framework
  18. 90-day starting plan
  19. Final strategy check

Use this template to develop a practical food tourism and gastronomy strategy for a destination, and to turn it into an action plan with named owners, timescales and measures.

Do not begin with a list of restaurants or a campaign idea. Start by understanding what is distinctive about the destination's food culture, who produces it, how visitors currently experience it, and where the gaps are. A strong gastronomy strategy connects tourism with the wider local food system: farmers, fishers, growers, producers, restaurants, cafés, markets, retailers, chefs, educational institutions, cultural organisations, event organisers and local communities.

Part 1 — Strategy

Sections 1 to 15. Complete these before writing any action.

1. Strategic context

Describe why you are developing a food tourism and gastronomy strategy now. Consider the current destination strategy, visitor economy objectives, local food and agricultural policy, cultural and heritage strategies, sustainability commitments, rural and urban development priorities, business development needs, seasonality, resident and community interests, and relevant national or regional tourism strategies.

Our strategic context

[Complete]

The main problem or opportunity this strategy should address

[Complete]

What is already decided, and what is genuinely open

Naming this early prevents a consultation that raises expectations the strategy cannot meet.

[Complete]

2. Define food tourism for our destination

Agree what food tourism means locally before you plan anything. Avoid defining gastronomy only through restaurants: consider the complete visitor relationship with food and place.

This can include restaurants and cafés, traditional dishes, contemporary food culture, local ingredients, farms and producers, fisheries, markets and food halls, bakeries, breweries and distilleries, food tours, cooking experiences, festivals and events, food heritage, Indigenous or traditional food knowledge where relevant, food-related landscapes, seasonal food traditions, food education and community food culture.

Our working definition of food tourism

[Complete]

What we are deliberately excluding, and why

[Complete]

3. Destination food identity

Ask one question: what can visitors eat, drink, learn or experience here that meaningfully connects them with this place?

DimensionWhat we have
Ingredients and products[Complete]
Dishes and recipes[Complete]
Producers and makers[Complete]
Restaurants and hospitality[Complete]
Markets and retail[Complete]
Food events and festivals[Complete]
Food landscapes[Complete]
Traditions and stories[Complete]
Contemporary food culture[Complete]

People

Identify the chefs, producers, growers, fishers, entrepreneurs and community members who contribute to the destination's food identity.

[Complete]

4. Food tourism asset map

Build an inventory of what already exists. Copy this block once per asset. Recording it as a block rather than a wide table keeps it readable on a phone, which matters when the mapping is done on site rather than at a desk.

  • Asset / experience: [Complete]
  • Location: [Complete]
  • Type: [Complete]
  • Visitor ready? [Yes / Partly / No]
  • Bookable? [Yes / No]
  • Available in relevant visitor languages? [Yes / Partly / No]
  • Seasonality: [Complete]
  • Accessibility considerations: [Complete]
  • Sustainability considerations: [Complete]
  • Potential role in the strategy: [Complete]
  • Asset / experience: [Complete]
  • Location: [Complete]
  • Type: [Complete]
  • Visitor ready? [Yes / Partly / No]
  • Bookable? [Yes / No]
  • Available in relevant visitor languages? [Yes / Partly / No]
  • Seasonality: [Complete]
  • Accessibility considerations: [Complete]
  • Sustainability considerations: [Complete]
  • Potential role in the strategy: [Complete]

Not every food producer needs to become a tourism business. Participation should match the capacity and the interest of the producer, and asking otherwise damages the relationship.

5. Visitor perspective

Base this on evidence rather than assumption. Draw on existing visitor research, surveys, reviews, search behaviour, social media, restaurant and attraction data, tour operator feedback, business interviews, visitor information enquiries and national tourism research.

Visitor groupWhat interests them about foodExperiences that could meet itCurrent barriersEvidence for this
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]

What we do not know, and how we will find out

[Complete]

6. Stakeholder and food ecosystem analysis

Map the organisations and people required to deliver this. Consider the DMO, municipality or regional authority, tourism businesses, restaurants, producers, farmers, fisheries, food processors, retail, markets, event organisers, universities and vocational education, cultural organisations, chambers of commerce, business development organisations, transport providers and local communities.

StakeholderRoleInterestCapacity to contributePotential contribution
[ ][ ][High/Med/Low][High/Med/Low][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]

7. Current experience assessment

Walk the visitor journey and mark where it breaks. At each stage ask: can visitors discover our food experiences, understand what is distinctive, find reliable information, book, and reach the experience? Is information available in the right languages? Are dietary requirements and accessibility communicated clearly? Does the experience connect food with place? Can a visitor easily find a related experience next?

StageWhat worksWhat breaksEvidence
Inspiration[ ][ ][ ]
Planning[ ][ ][ ]
Booking[ ][ ][ ]
Arrival[ ][ ][ ]
Experience[ ][ ][ ]
Sharing[ ][ ][ ]
Returning[ ][ ][ ]

Key strengths

[Complete]

Key gaps

[Complete]

8. Competitive and comparator analysis

Choose destinations that offer useful learning, not the most famous ones. For each, ask what their food proposition is, what experiences support it, how they organise collaboration, how they communicate their identity, what role the DMO plays, what appears transferable, and what depends on circumstances that differ from yours.

ComparatorTheir propositionHow they organise itTransferableNot transferable, and why
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]

Copying a successful food destination rarely works. The conditions that made it succeed are usually local.

9. Strategic diagnosis

StrengthsWeaknesses
[Complete][Complete]
OpportunitiesRisks
[Complete][Complete]

The strategic issues that matter most

  • Issue 1: [Complete]
  • Issue 2: [Complete]
  • Issue 3: [Complete]
  • Issue 4: [Complete]
  • Issue 5: [Complete]

10. Vision

Describe what the destination wants its food tourism offer to become. Write a destination outcome, not a marketing slogan. A useful test: could a producer, a chef and a municipal officer all recognise their own work in it?

Our food tourism vision

[Complete]

11. Strategic objectives

Set three to six objectives. Possible areas: strengthening local food identity, developing visitor-ready experiences, increasing local economic value, supporting year-round demand, connecting rural producers with visitors, improving experience quality, strengthening collaboration, increasing use of local products, improving accessibility, supporting sustainable food systems, developing skills, improving international visibility.

ObjectiveWhy it mattersDesired changeHow progress is measured
[ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ]

12. Experience development

TypeWhat we will develop
Signature experiences
strongly associated with the destination
[Complete]
Everyday food experiences
encountered without specialist planning
[Complete]
Bookable experiences
tours, tastings, workshops, producer visits
[Complete]
Events[Complete]
Routes and trails[Complete]
Seasonal experiences[Complete]
Business events opportunities
receptions, conference menus, local food showcases, incentive programmes, delegate experiences
[Complete]

13. Food storytelling

Define the stories the destination can substantiate. Possible themes: geography, climate, ingredients, agriculture, fishing, migration, cultural exchange, traditions, innovation, people, seasons.

For every story, four questions. Is this true? Can we demonstrate it? Who has the right to tell it? Does the story benefit the people and communities represented?

StoryEvidence it is trueWho has the right to tell itCommunity benefit
[ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ]

Do not manufacture traditions, and do not present a living food culture as a visitor commodity without the involvement of the community it belongs to.

14. Sustainability and responsibility

Assess local sourcing, food waste, seasonality, supply chains, biodiversity, water and energy use, transport, packaging, fair employment, community benefit, cultural ownership, accessibility and dietary inclusion.

Priority actionWhyEvidence we can showOwner
[ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ]

Make no environmental claim you cannot evidence. An unsupported sustainability claim is a reputational liability, and in several markets a regulatory one.

15. Governance

  • Lead organisation: [Complete]
  • DMO role: [Complete]
  • Partner roles: [Complete]
  • Decision-making structure: [Complete]
  • Industry engagement mechanism: [Complete]
  • Community participation: [Complete]
  • Review cycle: [e.g. quarterly steering group, annual strategy review]

How disagreement is resolved

Food strategies involve competing commercial interests. Agreeing this before the first disagreement is easier than during it.

[Complete]

Part 2 — Action plan

Every objective in section 11 becomes at least one action here.

16. Action plan

Copy this block for each action. An action without an owner and a date is an intention, not a plan.

FieldDetail
Action[ ]
Strategic objective supported[ ]
Why this action is needed[ ]
Lead organisation[ ]
Delivery partners[ ]
Start / target completion[ ] / [ ]
Resources: people[ ]
Resources: budget[ ]
Resources: external expertise[ ]
Resources: data or technology[ ]
Dependencies[ ]
Success measure[ ]
Evidence / data source[ ]
Risks and mitigation[ ]
Status[Not started / Planned / In progress / Complete / On hold]

Workstreams

Organise the actions under these nine workstreams. The suggested actions are prompts, not a required list.

1. Food identity and positioning

  • Complete destination food asset mapping
  • Agree the destination food narrative
  • Document priority food stories
  • Develop photography and content guidance
  • Establish terminology and translation guidance

2. Product and experience development

  • Identify experience-development gaps
  • Support producer visitor-readiness
  • Develop bookable food experiences
  • Improve connections between existing experiences
  • Develop seasonal experiences
  • Test new concepts with visitors before scaling

3. Business and skills development

  • Training for food producers entering tourism
  • Digital distribution support
  • Storytelling training
  • Accessibility training
  • International visitor readiness
  • AI and digital skills
  • Sustainable food practices

4. Partnerships and local food networks

  • Establish a destination food tourism network
  • Connect hospitality businesses with producers
  • Build collaboration with agriculture and fisheries
  • Connect tourism with education and research
  • Establish regular industry meetings

5. Visitor information and digital discoverability

  • Audit destination food content
  • Improve structured information about food experiences
  • Improve multilingual information
  • Improve dietary and accessibility information
  • Improve booking links
  • Review visibility in traditional and AI-powered search

On the last point: AI assistants now answer a large share of trip-planning questions. If your food experiences are not structured for machine reading, the answer a traveller receives is assembled from someone else's material. See the AIRETT Answer-Engine Optimisation resources in the Toolkit.

6. Marketing and communications

  • Develop evidence-based food content
  • Integrate gastronomy into destination campaigns
  • Build media and creator programmes
  • Develop seasonal campaigns
  • Support partner content
  • Connect food stories with wider destination positioning

Marketing follows product development. Do not promote experiences that cannot reliably meet the expectations you create.

7. Events and business events

  • Integrate local food into destination events
  • Develop food festival opportunities
  • Create local menu guidance for conferences
  • Develop food-related incentive experiences
  • Connect event organisers with local producers

8. Sustainability and community benefit

  • Increase local supply-chain connections
  • Reduce food waste
  • Improve measurement
  • Support seasonal sourcing
  • Include community food traditions appropriately
  • Improve accessibility and dietary inclusion

9. Research and measurement

  • Establish the baseline before claiming any impact
  • Agree which indicators are genuinely measurable
  • Set the review cycle

17. Measurement framework

Establish a baseline before claiming impact. Use an indicator only where reliable data exists; an indicator you cannot populate is worse than none, because it invites invention.

AreaIndicatorBaselineSourceReview
SupplyNumber of visitor-ready food experiences[ ][ ][ ]
Number of bookable experiences[ ][ ][ ]
DemandVisitor interest in gastronomy[ ][ ][ ]
Participation in food experiences[ ][ ][ ]
EconomicVisitor spending where measurable[ ][ ][ ]
StrategicPartner participation, actions completed[ ][ ][ ]
Sustainability[only where reliable data exists][ ][ ][ ]

Do not claim that food tourism caused an economic, social or environmental change unless the evidence supports that conclusion. Correlation with a good season is not causation.

18. 90-day starting plan

A strategy should lead quickly to practical work.

PhaseTasksOwnerDone
Days 1–30
Understand
Establish steering group · agree scope · gather existing research · map food tourism assets · map stakeholders · identify data gaps[ ][ ]
Days 31–60
Decide
Consult businesses and communities · analyse visitor needs · review comparators · define destination food identity · agree strategic issues · draft objectives[ ][ ]
Days 61–90
Mobilise
Agree vision and priorities · select first actions · assign owners · establish baseline measures · identify quick improvements · identify longer-term projects · publish the internal action plan[ ][ ]

19. Final strategy check

Before approving the strategy, work through these. A "no" is not a failure; it is the next piece of work.

QuestionYes / No
1. Is it based on evidence?[ ]
2. Does it reflect the destination's actual food culture?[ ]
3. Were producers and communities involved?[ ]
4. Does it include more than restaurants and marketing?[ ]
5. Are responsibilities clear?[ ]
6. Does every priority have an action?[ ]
7. Does every action have an owner?[ ]
8. Can progress be measured?[ ]
9. Are sustainability claims supported?[ ]
10. Is the strategy realistic within available resources?[ ]
11. Will it create value for local businesses and communities as well as visitors?[ ]
12. Can we explain clearly what will be different when the strategy succeeds?[ ]